Action Planning Template
| ||||
Goal: Does extended classroom instructional time in English/Language Arts and math result in overall improved student performance?
| ||||
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
1. Setting the Foundation
Meet with my site supervisor to discuss possible research topics
|
Self
Site Supervisor
|
Start: January 28, 2012
End: February 7, 2012
|
Proposed Action Research Topics:
**Block schedule vs. 55 minute 7-period class
**RtI Interventions & Processes
**Resource Classroom vs. Co-teach model
|
Develop, Review, Revise, and Finalize/ Approve Action Research Plan
|
2. Analyzing Data
Research various block schedules & how they work in other school districts
Gather data-----
2010-2011: 7th grade six weeks scores for math & ELA, semester 1 grades, common assessment scores, math and ELA benchmark scores, iStation BME scores, TAKS scores for math & ELA
2011-2012: 7th grade six weeks math & ELA scores, semester
1 grades, common assessment scores, math and ELA benchmark scores, iStation BME scores
|
Self
Registrar- for grades
Counselors- for TAKS scores
|
Start: February 2012
End: May 2012
|
Internet, Lamar Library, Blogs
Grades,
iStation reports, benchmark data from DMAC, TAKS ’10-’11 scores from counselors, student cumm. Files-possibly
|
Organize and compile data to begin research process
Break data down to compare 2010-2011 schedule with 2011-2012 current schedule.
Write reflection from data comparisons thus far.
|
3. Developing Deeper Understanding
Interview 7th ELA and math teachers as well as other core teachers
|
Self
Math & ELA teachers
(Other interested teachers)
|
Start: May 2012
End: May 2012
|
Interview questions relating to the adjustment from 90 mins. To 55 mins.
|
Review interviews, formulate new questions from interviews (if applicable)
Write reflection from interviews and list possible solutions to current schedule issues.
|
4. Engage in Self-Reflection
Begin to ask reflective questions pertaining to research plan
|
Self
|
Start: May 2012
***Continue throughout the research process
|
Develop reflective questions in regards to research (see example questions from cell phone example)
|
Reflection Journal & Blog
|
5. Exploring Programmatic Patterns
Discussion with site supervisor & other teachers involved- patterns observed from data, pros and cons of solutions, skills and resources essential to the success of this research project
Pros & Cons of Block vs. 7-period day
|
Self
Site supervisor
Math & ELA teachers as well as other involved teachers
|
May 2012 into Summer 2012 and continue throughout the research process as concerns arise
|
Develop a more definite solution to the research question based on discussion data obtained from site supervisor and teachers
|
Write reflection showing the pros and cons conducted during interviews and discussion
Create chart to show patterns observed from data collected
|
6. Determining Direction
Begin action research
|
Self
|
Summer 2012
|
Reference 7 questions from cell phone example:
1. Are you clear on what you are attempting to solve?
2. Have you adequately addressed the skills and resources questions?
3. Have you established a collaborative approach to the issue?
4. Are your time lines realistic?
5. Do you have a reasonable plan to monitor the project?
6. Do you have a reasonable plan for determining the level of success-how do you evaluate if the plan is effective?
7. How will you revise and improve the plan based on monitoring and evaluation?
|
Review answers to the 7 questions and continue to reflect on these questions throughout the research process
Journal and blog
|
7. Taking Action for School Improvement
Develop written plan of action
|
Self
**Possibly a committee to assist with project----mostly teachers
|
Start: August 2012
End: January 2013/February 2013
|
Chapter 7 Tool from resource section (template)
|
Written plan of action: formative evaluation & summative evaluation
|
8. Sustain Improvement
Share results from research and report findings with site supervisor and ELA & math teachers
|
Self
Site supervisor
7th grade ELA & math teachers
|
March 2013
|
Action research project findings
Feedback form/ questionnaire
|
Completed action research paper to share with site supervisor and teachers to discuss findings
Also share with online colleagues (blog)
Obtain feedback/ reflections from site supervisor and teachers
|
Format based on Tool 7.1 from Examining What We Do to Improve Our Schools
(Harris, Edmonson, and Combs, 2010)
My first two years of teaching, my third grade was departmentalized into reading/social studies and math/science. The students went to two teachers each day. This year, we chose to teach self-contained and have the same students all day, every day. From the teacher's perspective, I feel like I get much more teaching done on a flexible schedule. I also feel like I know the needs of my students much better. I favor self-contained in elementary, but it would interesting the see the pros and cons in secondary.
ReplyDeleteBeing an elementary teacher, I don't have any first hand experience with secondary scheduling issues. I've learned more about it in the past three weeks from reading discussion board posts and blog pages. I'm interested in the results of your project. I really can't think of any benefits to the 7/55 schedule. I teach 5th grade ELAR. Even though we are departmentalized, there are only 3 of us and our rooms are right next to one another, so it's not the same as secondary. I teach 3 80 minute blocks. I would have a hard time being effective in 55 minutes. I look forward to seeing what you find out.
ReplyDelete